The Arizona Process Servers Association is receiving commentary from both member and non-member process servers in which the servers are having difficulty logging onto the forum. We have offered to forward their comments. Please see the following unedited comment(s):

From: Rich 'Doc' Colley
<[email protected]>

So Barry I could not or didn't have credentials to comment...
But I would suspect my biggest complaint is the "live" requirement...

My comment would be this:

The whole of the world is still recovering from the Covid pandemic
and Arizona seems to be ignoring the issue. While it would appear
that the illness is successfully combated there are many who
are simply "scared" of being around large numbers of people. Just
walk into any big box store and you will see a number wearing
masks and some even gloves (on a hot day). Servers are always
in contact with the public and it is for the "public" that we would
suggest online training is better suited to the atmosphere we find
ourselves dealing with currently. And it is no more instructive
to boot. Most online CE classes are well created to allow
interaction and even substantial questions asked (all mine have
been such, I was allowed to email a question and did receive
answers in a short period). The idea of continuing education
depends upon uninterrupted and precise presentation of pertinent
information for the 'profession'. That means an "attention promoting"
atmosphere (and it is unarguable that a home/office online presence
is far more appropriate for such) that doesn't have a bunch of
background chatter, interpersonal renewal of friendships better
suited for anything except study, and the always present up and
down to renew coffee, water or other pit-stops... been in many
live CE classes and there is seldom a time when "everyone" is
in the room rather than grabbing a refreshment or attending a
personal moment. There can be no real question that "online
CE training" addresses all such "focus" issues better than live.
Please reconsiders.

Thank you Barry... IF you wish I can alter per your perspective
on exactly what is needed.
Rich 'Doc' Colley

The Arizona Process Servers Association is receiving commentary from both member and non-member process servers in which the servers are having difficulty logging onto the forum. We have offered to forward their comments. Please see the following unedited comment(s):

From: Christine Roy
[email protected]

Hi, I am Christine Roy, Private Process Server PM316 since 2004. I have read all the Administrative Office of the Courts proposed changes to the wordage of ACJA 7-204 which makes complete sense because it gets rid of cumbersome explanations of statutes. It reduces the chance of a reader not understanding the explanations of important parts of Private Process Server instructions. I do not agree with the section 4n. regarding Recertification of Private Process Servers only being able to receive 50% of the needed time, 5 hours out of 10 by utilizing online instruction. Online instruction is extremely useful because it may be very hard to get to an in person education. I live in Tucson and we are able to get 1 day a year of in person instruction by The Academy, a terrific outfit that has been challenging Process Servers for perhaps 20 years. If I am unable to take advantage of that particular day I miss out on 10 hours of CE. I must resort to online instruction or travel to Phoenix to make up work and that is just not doable. Arizona Private Process Servers should not be penalized because they live in different parts of Arizona. Online is an excellent way to go. After the CoVid mess we are all used to online learning. Thankyou for allowing me to share my thoughts on the changes planned for us the Arizona Private Process Servers.

Christine Roy

The Arizona Process Servers Association recently requested comments from those members & non-member process servers to be posted on this subject. For those unable to log into or create an account on the forum, we offered to forward their unedited email to the AOC. Please see the following unedited email reprinted with the writer’s permission:

From: "Carl LeBlanc" <[email protected]>

Hello,

My name is Carl LeBlanc, I am a fairly new Process Server working mostly Rural locations in the North Eastern part of Arizona.

I believe having a "self-study" solution to CE is reasonable considering other "Departments " of the Courts, as well as, our Police and other Law enforcement, the State Bar, etc, offer such solutions.

Driving nearly 3 hours into the metro area causes a burden that most of these other departments don't necessarily carry.

Process Service is an intricate part of the Court Process, but under supported. We carry a huge load in risk, fuel expenses, auto repair, extra time in our attempts and serves. Having to travel to "CE" cuts into our personal time, family time and extra expenses away from our region.

Please consider reasonable accommodation to reduce expense and loss if time to Process Servers.

Thank you,

Carl LeBlanc
Lic# NV2021-0005
928-707-3991

I agree with Mr Ratcliff that the comment period needs to be longer. Don Stiver

The Arizona Process Servers Association recently requested comments from those members & non-member process servers to be posted on this subject. For those unable to log into or create an account on the forum, we offered to forward their unedited email to the AOC. Please see the following unedited email reprinted with the writer’s permission:

from: Jamie Trevillyan <[email protected]>

I agree with the proposed changes the ASPA is proposing in regard to the proposed amendment being set forth in the ARIZONA CODE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION Part 7: Administrative Office of the Courts Chapter 2: Certification and Licensing Programs Section 7-204: Private Process Server. As a private process server for the past 4 years, I have only had to go through the renewal process for a private process server, once. After I submitted all the requested information, there was a delay in the fingerprint/background check that lead to a delay in my certification renewal completion. My business would have been seriously injured based on the current language outlined in the proposed amendment. Furthermore, this new language would have prohibited me from completing continuing education hours that would count towards my next renewal. As is the case with most business owners and professionals, my time is valuable, and I drive a territory that is greater than 8,000 square miles encompassing all of Cochise County, East Pima County, Green Valley County, and Santa Cruz County, therefore, I must meter my time appropriately.

The proposed language in the amendment for the renewal process would create confusion, time loss, and extraneous costs to my personal business, such that would create certain hardships in my ability to perform my profession. However, the proposed changes to the language of the amendment, that are being set forth by the ASPA are consistent with my desires as a business professional and as a representative and officer of the court. I love the work that I do as a private process server providing civil service for parties involved in the process of law. It is my hope the courts will take into consideration the words presented in the ASPA response letter and comments presented to you by process servers who feel as I do.

Thank you,
~Jamie Trevillyan